Why marketing needs different approaches to measurement
Marketing processes can be predictable or unpredictable, requiring different measurement methods. This distinction is crucial for making informed decisions.
Original reporting · martech.org
Read “Why marketing needs different approaches to measurement” at MarTech →
How this was written. Clicktag wrote this article with a language model from MarTech’s reporting (model: @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast); it describes that reporting rather than adding to it. The original, linked above, is the full story.
Key points from MarTech’s report
- Marketing processes can be categorized as either stable or unpredictable, requiring different measurement approaches.
- Stable marketing processes can be measured precisely, while unpredictable processes require a more nuanced approach.
- The use of precise metrics in unpredictable marketing environments can lead to misleading conclusions and poor decision-making.
- VUCA marketing processes, such as marketing and sales campaigns, require a more adaptive approach that acknowledges variability and uncertainty.
- Using ranges and probabilities can be more effective than precise numbers in complex marketing environments.
Marketing encompasses a range of processes, some of which are predictable and repeatable, while others are characterized by constant change and uncertainty. This variability necessitates distinct approaches to measurement.
In stable marketing environments, precise metrics can be effectively applied, whereas unpredictable activities require a more nuanced approach to avoid misleading conclusions and poor decision-making.
The stability of a marketing function is largely determined by the degree of variability and certainty in the work. When inputs and outputs are consistent and reliable, measurement is more straightforward.
Certain marketing processes, such as brand asset usage and email list hygiene, are considered stable due to the presence of external constraints like regulations and internal guidelines like brand guidelines.
Examples of stable marketing processes also include creative approval checklists, social media posting cadence, and budget allocation reporting. These processes can be measured precisely, allowing for the creation of efficiencies and best practices.
In contrast, marketing also involves unpredictable and complex environments, which are often characterized by continually changing external conditions, novel situations, and competing objectives. These conditions are referred to as VUCA, an acronym that stands for volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous.
VUCA marketing processes, such as marketing and sales campaigns, customer journey management, and revenue forecasting, cannot be measured with the same level of precision as stable processes. Instead, they require a more adaptive approach that acknowledges the inherent variability and uncertainty. This article is based on reporting by MarTech.
Questions and answers
What is the difference between stable and unpredictable marketing processes?
Stable marketing processes have consistent and reliable inputs and outputs, while unpredictable processes are characterized by continual change and uncertainty.
Why is it important to use different measurement approaches for stable and unpredictable marketing processes?
Using the wrong measurement approach can lead to misleading conclusions and poor decision-making, highlighting the need for distinct methods.
What are some examples of VUCA marketing processes?
VUCA marketing processes include marketing and sales campaigns, customer journey management, and revenue forecasting, which are characterized by continually changing external conditions and competing objectives.
